Spontaneous Electrical Low-frequency Oscillations (SELFOs)

Phys.org has a great overview of two issues from Royal Society Publishing on the origins of nervous systems. One great thing about the issues is it seems so far at least that almost every article in the two issues seems to be freely and easily available to anyone. The direct links to the issues are here and here.

The Phys.org article by John Hewitt Where did brains come from? focuses especially on the origins of nervous systems with neurotransmitters. “Jékely’s chemical brain hypothesis postulates that neurotransmitters came before synapses and neurites, as opposed to the other way around. In other words, transmitters make nervous systems”. However, the coverage of the two issues is much broader than the Phys.org article suggests. It includes, among others, papers on learning in slime molds, origin of self, and transitions in learning and cognition by Simona Ginsburg and Eva Jablonka.

However, what has more immediately attracted my attention is a paper by Alison Hanson Spontaneous electrical low-frequency oscillations: a possible role in Hydra and all living systems. I would like to quote some major excerpts from it. Here is its abstract. Bolding is mine.

As one of the first model systems in biology, the basal metazoan Hydra has been revealing fundamental features of living systems since it was first discovered by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in the early eighteenth century. While it has become well-established within cell and developmental biology, this tiny freshwater polyp is only now being re-introduced to modern neuroscience where it has already produced a curious finding: the presence of low-frequency spontaneous neural oscillations at the same frequency as those found in the default mode network in the human brain. Surprisingly, increasing evidence suggests such spontaneous electrical low-frequency oscillations (SELFOs) are found across the wide diversity of life on Earth, from bacteria to humans. This paper reviews the evidence for SELFOs in diverse phyla, beginning with the importance of their discovery in Hydra, and hypothesizes a potential role as electrical organism organizers, which supports a growing literature on the role of bioelectricity as a ‘template’ for developmental memory in organism regeneration.

And here is where the paper points to similarities between oscillations in the Hydra and the Default Mode Network in the human brain.

Sherrington’s still-influential proposal of the nervous system as effectively a ‘reflex organ’ waiting for environmental stimuli to push the organism to behavioural response —the foundational proposition of the input–output view of information processing —cannot account for spontaneous neural activity that seemingly has no effect on behaviour. As we have seen, however, such ‘cryptic’, non-behaviour-inducing spontaneous activity has been recognized in Cnidaria for more than half a century. Although speculated to play a role in coordinating animal behaviour at the time, the function of this activity was left to ‘future work’, which was never done. While poorly understood, findings across diverse Cnidaria were essentially the same: endogenously active nervous systems produced rhythmic, low-frequency pulses even in an unchanging environment and even when organisms were at rest. Why? Why would energetically expensive nervous systems be perpetually active in the absence of a stimulus and in the absence of any discernible behaviour? A clue about the potential role of this low-frequency spontaneous neural activity in comparatively simple organisms comes from an unexpected place: the human brain.

This is tied back to theories by Buszáki.

Another way to think about the potential role of the DMN in human self-construction is as the top layer of the hierarchical predictive coding ‘self-model’ as put forth by Friston. Like Buszáki’s theory, which predicts the need for an ultimate brain integrator or ‘reader’ (i.e. a ‘self’), a hierarchical predictive coding model also implies the need for an ultimate brain integrator or ‘predictor’ (also a ‘self’) at the top of the hierarchy. According to predictive coding brain models, prediction error is passed up the hierarchy from the low-level primary, unimodal sensory areas to the ultimate, multi-modal ‘predictor’ at the top of the hierarchy, which contains a high-level abstract representation (of the ‘self’) that then passes predictions back down to the lower levels. In this way, the DMN, oscillating at the lowest frequency in the brain, might act as the brain’s ultimate information integrator, receiving input from all the lower-level, otherwise isolated units (oscillating at higher frequencies), and passing on one unified ‘self’ prediction back down to generate coherent, adaptive behaviour

In conclusion, the author Hanson conjectures “that SELFOs may be the ultimate organism-wide electrical information integrators and communicators in all biological systems at all levels of scale, making them critical for maintenance of organism unity and coherent, adaptive behaviour”.

McFadden in his EM field theories emphasizes the noticeable synchronous firing of neurons during cognition, however, seems to pay little attention to the so-called “background noise” of the brain. These noticeable firings (frequently shown in red on brain images) are frequently used as proxy representations of consciousness in many cognition studies. I would suggest this might be a mistake. Base consciousness might be found in the EM fields generated by regular, even somewhat non-descript, firings of the DMN whereas the noticeable firings found on MRIs may, in fact, represent the integration of new information into the base consciousness.

Whatever the case may be Hanson provides some interesting thoughts in line with the Cellular Basis of Consciousness theory of Reber..

This entry was posted in Consciousness, Electromagnetism, Origin of Life. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Spontaneous Electrical Low-frequency Oscillations (SELFOs)

  1. Steve Ruis says:

    So, those whackos in the 1920’s in California who kept talking and writing about existence in different vibratory planes may have been right? (Thee must have been be some form of “enough monkeys typing . . . “)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Wyrd Smythe says:

    It may not (pardon the pun) connect, but I was just reading about cable bacteria, which are wire-like with one end buried in oxygen-free food and the other in an oxygen-available interface. Electrons from the oxygen reduction get sent down the cable to assist in food processing. Kinda wild.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. An interesting batch of papers, although most of it is too inside baseball for me. The one by Simona Ginsburg and Eva Jablonka looks interesting with its transition hierarchy. It’s what they presented in their book, but perhaps simplified. And the reafference paper also looks interesting.

    James, I’ve been meaning to mention to you, you might want to check out the writing of Peter Godfrey-Smith. I tried his books, but didn’t find his thoughts about consciousness worth enduring all the diving stories to get. But I saw somewhere that he discusses field theories in his book Metazoa, although I don’t know how how deeply he explores them. Based on my sampling, it might be a bit shallow. Still, you might find it interesting, particularly if you like underwater nature narratives.

    Liked by 1 person

    • James Cross says:

      I’ve read the Soul of an Octopus. It was interesting but found it somewhat oriented to the best seller list crowd. Might take a look at Metazoa.

      Liked by 1 person

    • James Cross says:

      I didn’t realize that he was one of the authors on one of these papers.

      Reafference and the origin of the self in early nervous system evolution

      The argument seems to one similar to ones I have made that finds the origins of self in control of the body and sensing of its position in space.

      “We propose, instead, that much early sensing was reafferent; it was responsive to the consequences of the animal’s own actions. We distinguish two general categories of reafference—translocational and deformational—and use these to survey the distribution of several often-neglected forms of sensing, including gravity sensing, flow sensing and proprioception”.

      This would put the origin of subjectivity itself fairly far back in evolutionary history.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Secret Ingredient? | Broad Speculations

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s